Fwd: [bangla-vision] WHAT A WISHFUL THINKING? WOULD IT SUCCEED? WHERE THE PROPOSAL HAVE COME FROM? WHOSE INTERESTS LAWRENCE SOLOMON LOOKING FOR (National Post, FP 21, 11th September, 2010)... and MORE? Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DR AWATAR SINGH SEKHON <assekhon@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] WHAT A WISHFUL THINKING? WOULD IT SUCCEED? WHERE THE PROPOSAL HAVE COME FROM? WHOSE INTERESTS LAWRENCE SOLOMON LOOKING FOR (National Post, FP 21, 11th September, 2010)... and MORE? Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*
To: Bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com, Habibyousafzai@gmail.com, pakistanaffairs@yahoogroups.com, Pakistanpost@yahoogroups.com
Cc: kartarpursahib@yahoo.co.uk

 

WHAT A WISHFUL THINKING? WOULD IT SUCCEED? WHERE THE PROPOSAL HAVE COME FROM? WHOSE INTERESTS LAWRENCE SOLOMON LOOKING FOR (National Post, FP 21, 11th September, 2010)... and MORE?

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)*

The article, Break up of Pakistan FP 12 in National Post of 11th September, 2010, written under the name of Lawrence Solomon, is highly interesting and full of wishful thinking for the 'Break up of Pakistan'. It is, however, not known who inspired the author to create more problems in the world already full of intolerance, specifically in the troubled spots of our world, South Asia. The writer is wondering whether Lawrence Solomon has ever visited and studied the history of South Asia? In the author's views, you (Solomon) are, Sir,  virtually unfamiliar with the South Asian situation and the history of the people of this region. If you knew the history of what is called the Indian sub-continent, you would have never chosen this topic. The topic which is full of complications and beyond the understanding of an ordinary individual or journalist. Let me elaborate, Sir Lawrence Solomon, that by writing on your chosen subject, you have shown that what sort of a simpleton you are.

Before I answer your artificiality of nation brought into being by the deliberately dismembered of East Pakistan by Indira Gandhi and her armed forces of India and East Pakistan's traitor Mujib ur Rehman, now called Bangladesh. This Bangladesh has not been able to stand on its own feet. It has not yielded a stable administration and has not been immune to military involvements. Once again you have been suggesting that 'Pakistan's floods have been an opportunity in disguise to carry out further 'dismemberment' of Pakistan.  

Your reasoning (opportunity) to 'Break up Pakistan' is but an analogy of a simpleton like you who could think and deal with this subject. The subject which is not so simple. Moreover, you do not have the real background of Pakistan, except what the letters P, A, K, S and Tan stand for. I feel rather pity of your understanding on whicht you have tried to base your assumption, but do not know who suggested to you to hatch this analogy for you. The analogy based on such a wide and distorted history (see The Sikhs: Sovereignty To Slavery by Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, August 2010, ISBN 978-0-9811360-8-0) of Pakistan, a brainchild of yours, although your writing gives me a vague idea who might have planted the seed in your mind, guided you in this direction and/or else has tried to fire his/her gun from your shoulder. Merely based on floods (maybe the man made diaster in today's advanced world and using the HAARP technology, etc.), no one could think of starting a 'scessionist movement'. Should some force work on your analogy the consequences will be unimaginable and uncalculated problems beyond control who follow the analogy. Like in 1980s, the 'Brahmins-Hindus' of India tried very much to slander the Sikhs, but did not succeed. Now, the very 'Brahmins-Hindus' of India, have been playing in certain 'unknown' hands to declare themselves the 'super power' of South Asia at the expense of all South Asian nations but the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. 

Because of this dream, the dream of Indian colonialism and expensionism, and their chronic notoriousness, they have been dreaming to fulfill their dream of super power at the expense to destroy the very existence of numerous nations (sovereign and waiting to be sovereign), who have been struggling to regain their 'sovereignty' since the very inception of the alleged Indian democracy, since as far back as 14th March, 1849. To destroy the very existence of these nations, the Brahmins-Hindus of India had no choice but to field the idea to 'Break up Pakistan', Sir Soloman. The 'Brahmins' have been defined as the 'Butcher of Mankind' by the founder of the Sikh religion in 15th century and his teachings have been inscribed in the Sikh scripture, Guru Granth Sahib. First, these 'Brahmins-Hindus' have been playing against the of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under Indian occupation, since 15th August, 1947)', waged an 'Undeclared' war against the Sikhs of Punjab in the form of a brutal military "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, killed more than 270,000 Sikhs indiscriminatory since 1980, turned the Sikhs' Landless Nation,PUNJAB, in a 'Concentration Camp', and they have turned against the very existence of their traditional enemy, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to 'Break up (Pakistan)'. What is the yield of a crooked mind! The crooked minds who had been 'subservient' to Afghans, Mughals, Sikhs, British, Potuguese, etc., for more than 3500 years until the early morning hours of 15th August,1947.

Please do not forget that if your analogy, 'Break up of Pakistan', is followed, the players must not forget that they will be opening the 'Pandora's Box'. The nations within an artificial 'Union of Nations, India' will have to be 'disintigrated' and the Sikhs of the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, the Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, 7-sister of Assam, Manipur, Bodos, Dalits (70-75% of the total Indian population of more than 1.2 billion), 400-million hungry mouths of India who go to sleep hungry every night, 365 nights of a year, Adivaasis/moolnivasis would have to be declared 'sovereign nations'. Only 4% Brahmins and 11% of Hindus cannot and will not be allowed to 'control' the destiny of the non-Brahmins and non-Hindus. Why should the rest of more than 85% non-Brahmins and non-Hindus suffer in the 'chains of the Brahminica-Hindul slavery'? Could you come up with any amicable solution to the 'Brahminical slavery of 85% non-Brahmins-Hindus, Sir Soloman? Now, the ball is in your court whether you would propose the 'Break up of the alleged Indian(Brahmins-Hindus) democracy or the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Before I finish, Iwould like to say that there are 15% Muslims under the 'slavery of Brahmins-Hindus'; therefore, who would be kidding who?

Indeed, you may break up Pakistan if a person like 15-25% is a head of state of any country.

Regards.

* Associate Professor (Retired), Medical Microbiology and Immunology

Director (Former), National Centre for Human Mycotic Diseases CANADA

Editor in Chief

International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435

*****

__._,_.___

--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/