THE HIMALAYAN TALK: INDIAN GOVERNMENT FOOD SECURITY PROGRAM RISKIER

http://youtu.be/NrcmNEjaN8c The government of India has announced food security program ahead of elections in 2014. We discussed the issue with Palash Biswas in Kolkata today. http://youtu.be/NrcmNEjaN8c Ahead of Elections, India's Cabinet Approves Food Security Program ______________________________________________________ By JIM YARDLEY http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/indias-cabinet-passes-food-security-law/

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS CRITICAL OF BAMCEF LEADERSHIP

[Palash Biswas, one of the BAMCEF leaders and editors for Indian Express spoke to us from Kolkata today and criticized BAMCEF leadership in New Delhi, which according to him, is messing up with Nepalese indigenous peoples also. He also flayed MP Jay Narayan Prasad Nishad, who recently offered a Puja in his New Delhi home for Narendra Modi's victory in 2014.]

THE HIMALAYAN DISASTER: TRANSNATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT MECHANISM A MUST

We talked with Palash Biswas, an editor for Indian Express in Kolkata today also. He urged that there must a transnational disaster management mechanism to avert such scale disaster in the Himalayas. http://youtu.be/7IzWUpRECJM

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS LASHES OUT KATHMANDU INT'L 'MULVASI' CONFERENCE

अहिले भर्खर कोलकता भारतमा हामीले पलाश विश्वाससंग काठमाडौँमा आज भै रहेको अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मूलवासी सम्मेलनको बारेमा कुराकानी गर्यौ । उहाले भन्नु भयो सो सम्मेलन 'नेपालको आदिवासी जनजातिहरुको आन्दोलनलाई कम्जोर बनाउने षडयन्त्र हो।' http://youtu.be/j8GXlmSBbbk

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS LASHES OUT KATHMANDU INT'L 'MULVASI' CONFERENCE

अहिले भर्खर कोलकता भारतमा हामीले पलाश विश्वाससंग काठमाडौँमा आज भै रहेको अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मूलवासी सम्मेलनको बारेमा कुराकानी गर्यौ । उहाले भन्नु भयो सो सम्मेलन 'नेपालको आदिवासी जनजातिहरुको आन्दोलनलाई कम्जोर बनाउने षडयन्त्र हो।' http://youtu.be/j8GXlmSBbbk

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS BLASTS INDIANS THAT CLAIM BUDDHA WAS BORN IN INDIA

THE HIMALAYAN VOICE: PALASH BISWAS DISCUSSES RAM MANDIR

Published on 10 Apr 2013 Palash Biswas spoke to us from Kolkota and shared his views on Visho Hindu Parashid's programme from tomorrow ( April 11, 2013) to build Ram Mandir in disputed Ayodhya. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77cZuBunAGk

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALSH BISWAS FLAYS SOUTH ASIAN GOVERNM

Palash Biswas, lashed out those 1% people in the government in New Delhi for failure of delivery and creating hosts of problems everywhere in South Asia. http://youtu.be/lD2_V7CB2Is

Palash Biswas on BAMCEF UNIFICATION!

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS ON NEPALI SENTIMENT, GORKHALAND, KUMAON AND GARHWAL ETC.and BAMCEF UNIFICATION! Published on Mar 19, 2013 The Himalayan Voice Cambridge, Massachusetts United States of America

BAMCEF UNIFICATION CONFERENCE 7

Published on 10 Mar 2013 ALL INDIA BAMCEF UNIFICATION CONFERENCE HELD AT Dr.B. R. AMBEDKAR BHAVAN,DADAR,MUMBAI ON 2ND AND 3RD MARCH 2013. Mr.PALASH BISWAS (JOURNALIST -KOLKATA) DELIVERING HER SPEECH. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLL-n6MrcoM http://youtu.be/oLL-n6MrcoM

Imminent Massive earthquake in the Himalayas

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS CRITICIZES GOVT FOR WORLD`S BIGGEST BLACK OUT

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS CRITICIZES GOVT FOR WORLD`S BIGGEST BLACK OUT

THE HIMALAYAN TALK: PALASH BISWAS TALKS AGAINST CASTEIST HEGEMONY IN SOUTH ASIA

Palash Biswas on Citizenship Amendment Act

Mr. PALASH BISWAS DELIVERING SPEECH AT BAMCEF PROGRAM AT NAGPUR ON 17 & 18 SEPTEMBER 2003 Sub:- CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT 2003 http://youtu.be/zGDfsLzxTXo

Welcome

Website counter
website hit counter
website hit counters

Tweet Please

Palash Biswas On Unique Identity No1.mpg

Monday, November 21, 2011

UNESCO’s activism on Palestine It’s a sounding board for world’s conscience by S. Nihal Singh

UNESCO's activism on Palestine
It's a sounding board for world's conscience
by S. Nihal Singh

IT is a curious fact that UNESCO, the United Nations' cultural organisation, has repeatedly emerged as the bellwether of the UN system, rather than its august and powerful Security Council. In granting the Palestinians full membership, the first UN agency to do so, it has shown yet again that it is more in tune with the world's aspirations than other organs.

It is even curiouser that UNESCO cannot discharge one of its two main briefs, of giving the world intellectual leadership, by the simple fact that there cannot be any honest intellectual debate by delegates representing their governments in an ever-expanding United Nations. Each delegate seeks to score points or watch his backside in the less than glorious traditions of free speech their countries represent. UNESCO executive board members became the direct representatives of their governments only in 1954.

Indeed, UNESCO has been engaged with the question of Israeli occupation of Palestinian land over many years. Although the UN General Assembly decreed that "Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination" in 1975, the first move against Israel's part in the UN system was made by UNESCO at least one year earlier. In the Paris conference of 1974, the Arabs spearheaded three resolutions which were passed, including a condemnation of Israel for "its persistence in altering the historical features of the City of Jerusalem and undertaking excavations which constitute a danger to its monuments, subsequent to the illegal occupation of this city". American retribution was swift in the form of withholding contributions to UNESCO under a Congressional injunction.

In 1976, there emerged the most controversial debates in UNESCO on the New World Information Order, an issue of much heat and rhetoric under the director-generalship of the Senegalese Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow. In a sense, the US and the African countries in particular were arguing at cross-purposes. It merged in the American mind with a process of strangling free media with government-aided projects while the priority in the minds of the developing world was in gathering the wherewithal to receive support in new technology and the basics of journalism.

Once the liberal establishment in the US, UNESCO's predominant constituency, had convinced itself of what it viewed as an attack on free media, the die was cast. America gave notice of withdrawal from the agency and left at the end of 1984, depriving it of essential funds, slavishly followed by Britain and opportunistically by tiny Singapore. But the US government had a wider agenda. It was to make an example of UNESCO in the UN system. It was testing new ideas on weighted voting, later to be taken up in the parent United Nations, and to reassert a leadership role in multilateral fora.

I had then asked a US delegate to UNESCO why his government was picking on UNESCO, called the weakest link in the UN system. His answer was sharp: "What is wrong in picking on the weakest link?"

This time the Palestinian issue has deprived UNESCO of 22 per cent of its budget, the US share; Israel retaliated with withholding its 3 per cent contribution. The United States is hoping that it would not have to use its veto in the Security Council yet again to save Israel because intense lobbying will probably prevent the Palestine resolution from receiving the needed nine votes. Later, when the issue comes to the UN General Assembly, it will find overwhelming approval, giving Palestinians an upgrade in status falling short of full membership.

The voting figures in UNESCO were striking: 114 for, 14 against, 52 abstentions and 21 absentees. America's Pavlovian response to granting Palestinian rights is as understandable as it is indefensible: the American-Israeli lobby exercises a vice-like grip on the US political establishment whoever the President may be.

But UNESCO's activism on the Israeli-Palestinian issue has come at a cost. The anti-Israel resolutions of 1974 led to a boycott by Ionesco, Sartre and Iris Murdoch, among others. Today it would be difficult to find a person of world eminence on the executive board. As a Western ambassador told me in the early 1980s, "We, in the conference and the executive board, are civil servants trying to do our job. But there isn't one notable intellectual – writer, painter or thinker – amongst us. And take the secretariat. M'Bow is not an intellectual…"

Incapable of achieving its intellectual mission, UNESCO does serve a purpose as a sounding board for the world's conscience. While the US and other major powers are quibbling over minutiae on the rights and wrongs of particular moves while Israel triumphantly gobbles up more and more of occupied Palestinian land on the West Bank and in occupied Palestinian East Jerusalem, there is one UN agency that raises a finger for the Palestinian cause.

In real terms, Palestinians' full membership of UNESCO might not amount to much, but it does make a moral point. And in a world in which realpolitik often triumphs over injustice, there is at least one UN agency that has made a statement. The UNESCO director-general, Irina Bokova, is left with the problem of cutting the agency's programmes, given the loss of US contribution, but in an unintended sense, while UNESCO cannot surmount its deficiencies as an intellectual organisation, it can still say 'no' to American-supported Israeli power. In a sad footnote, Germany voted against the resolution, teaming up with the United States.

It is well to recall the fervour of the plenary meeting of November 16, 1945. The opening preambular paragraph of UNESCO's constitution says, "Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed". Paragraph 1 of Article I began with the statement: "The purpose of the organisation is to contribute to peace and security…" Not all were equally enthusiastic. Leon Blum said, "The war (World War II) that has just ended…has shown us how education, culture (in the strictest sense) and science itself may be distorted against the common interests of humanity."

S. Nihal Singh, a senior journalist, is the author of a study, "The Rise and Fall of UNESCO".

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...