- Letter to the Indian President To read and endorse this letter click the link above. - Letter the Indian National Human Rights Commission (NHRC.) To read this letter, click the link above. You can also send endorsments for both the letters to: admin@justiceforafzalguru.org Partial list of endorsors so far: Anand Patwardhan, Arundhati Roy, Noam Chomsky, Sister Helen Prejean, Harsh Mandar, S. A. R. Geelani, Sandeep Pandey, Justice Suresh, Gautam Navlakha, Ved Bhasin, Ziauddin Sardar Praful Bidwai, Ram Puniyani, Dionne Bunsha, Jyoti Punwani, Asgar Ali Engineer, Ammu Abraham. Send in your endorsments today! Please also support a new petition to the President. It is sponsored by Mukul Dube, N. D. Pancholi and Harsh Kapoor | Click here
By Indira Jaising, Hindustan Times, 20 Jan., 2007
To send a man to his death without legal representation is not only unconstitutional but also barbaric | Click
A letter to NDTV by N. D. Pancholi (Afzal Guru's lawyer), 26 Dec., 2006
"Your repeated news bulletins over two days reduced the issue of the hanging of Afzal and his Mercy Petition pending with the President to a very simplistic solution "Show repeatedly the video tape (an unlawful piece of evidence) of the alleged confession of Afzal recorded in police custody as breaking news, convince the viewers that it has brought out the ultimate truth, ask them to send SMS messages to NDTV conveying their opinions about the "—Phansi" (hanging) of Afzal, and then pour out the "—collective opinion" gathered in this manner to pave the way for the prompt hanging of Afzal."What a simple, quick solution of an issue involving the life and death of a citizen!" | Click Media bending the truth to push Afzal to the gallows -- Bv Arundhati Roy, Hindustan Times, 23 December 2006. | Click India's shame -- Bv Arundhati Roy, The Guardian, 15 December 2006. | Click If the proceedings of the trial of Afzal guru and three others before the designated judge under POTA were to be videographed one would have understood the trivialization of rule of law in this country.
-- K. G. Kannabiran, President People's Union for Civil Liberties. | Click A letter to Hindustan Times by Sandeep Vaidya, 25 Dec., 2006. | Click Afzal Guru's hanging will reinforce the perception of two sets of legal norms prevalent in a society polarising fast on communal lines, says Ram Puniyani By Ram Puniyani, Combat Law, Nov - Dec 2006 | Click Also, In Defence of Afzal By Colin Gonsalves, Combat Law, Nov - Dec 2006 It will remind Kashmiris once again how communal and biased Indians are when it comes to Kashmir.
By Inam ul Rehman, Kashmir Affairs | Click Kashmir sees another son being hanged
When a Delhi court awarded death sentence to the Kashmiri Muhammad Afzal Guru, what first came to minds of the agonized Kashmiris was a previous hanging in Delhi's Tihar jail. That hanging changed not only the course of Kashmir history, but also resulted in a drastic change in the political thinking of Kashmiris says Pervez Majeed. Kashmir Affairs | Click The Very Strange Story of the Attack on the Indian Parliament
-- By Arundhati Roy, Outlook, 30 October 2006
"To invoke the 'collective conscience of society' to validate ritual murder, which is what the death penalty is, skates precariously close to valorising lynch law.It's chilling to think that this has been laid upon us not by predatory politicians or sensation-seeking journalists (though they too have done that), but as an edict from the highest court in the land."
Article | Original Link The case of a Kashmiri Muslim convicted for terrorism raises serious questions about the operation of Indian democracy, says Shubh Mathur Link . Unfortunately no one from both the sides, for as well as against the execution, is looking at the real background of the whole episode. It is a pity that even those who have been continuously protesting against this execution and claim to stand for the rights of Kashmiris have not been able to project their case in the right perspective, says M. Ashraf. Article | Greater Kashmir Online "I don't know how many of you are aware of the Intelligence Bureau or Home Ministry again making attempts to use media as a tool." By Anuradha Bhasin Jamwal, Executive Editor of Kashmir Times. Click The Supreme Court acknowledges that Mohammed Afzal Guru is not a terrorist and that they have no direct evidence against him. Is he on death row on the basis of a shoddy probe? Mihir Srivastava looks at critical questions still unanswered. Link Also, How did the police get to Geelani? The Economic and Political Weekly, September 17, 2005
Three judicial pronouncements have been made on the Parliament attack case including the latest Supreme Court judgment. But certain questions are still unanswered: Who attacked Parliament and what was the conspiracy? On what basis did the NDA government take the country close to a nuclear war? What were the roles of the state task force of Jammu and Kashmir and special cell of Delhi police investigating the cases? Given the momentous nature of these questions, for the future of Indian democracy nothing less than a Parliamentary enquiry is necessary to provide the answers.
By Nirmalangshu Mukherji | Article | ZNet Interview By Nandita Haksar, 30 Sept., 2006 | Click
|
No comments:
Post a Comment