"The world that awaits us, if our New Masters prevail, will be a grim dystopia. It will be a spiritual wasteland in which an unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the teeming masses. It will be a cruel world of exploitation, moral darkness, and unspeakable brutality." — Lasha Darkmoon, America Vanquished
by Israel Shamir
Response, Pictures and Captions by Lasha Darkmoon
The gifted British poet Lasha Darkmoon recently published a new essay in two parts called America Vanquished, claiming that the US, Germany and Russia were colonised by Jews.
How close to truth is she? Being a Gothic poet, she embellished her essay a lot, but here is the important part. She says:
In short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with their own petard.
But why worry? American Jews are Americans, are they not? If they're smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn't they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world through America? No one denies this is America's aim: full-spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn't it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable.
Jewish world domination takes on a different perspective when viewed through this historical prism. No "conspiracy theories" here. No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance — with Jews leading the pack.
You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.
ANTI-SEMITIC CARTOON OF THE PREDATORY JEW GRASPING THE GLOBE IN HIS TALON-LIKE CLUTCHES (French caricature, 1898). "No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack." — Lasha Darkmoon.
Lasha Darkmoon claims, that if the Jews form an elite in the US, then US world dominance is a form of Jewish world dominance.
Her second claim is that the US has became a colony of Israel. She even claims that "America is now Israel's slave".
There is a huge logical leap here: even if US Jews form an important part of the US elites, why would they give away their leadership to their cousins and brethren in the Middle East?
DARKMOON: (stepping in) Good point, Mr Shamir. Now consider my logic and try to refute this: If the Israeli Jews give the orders to the American Jews, and if the American Jews control America, then clearly America has become an Israeli colony. But if, on the contrary, American Jews exercise all the power and tell the Israeli Jews what to do, then clearly Israel is an American colony. The logic is inescapable.
Let's go to the next step.
Once it is admitted that America is controlled by its Jews, whether Israeli Jews or American Jews, America becomes in effect a JEWISH colony.
Given that American Jews were former immigrants to America who have managed to "take over" America, you could say that Jewry has colonized America. Ergo: no matter which way you slice it, America is either an Israeli colony or a Jewish colony. The logic of my argument, I put it to you, is irrefutable.
We can take this therefore as proven: if America is not an Israeli colony, taking its orders from Israeli Jews, then it is a Jewish colony, taking its orders from American Jews.
SHAMIR: World Jewry is a project rather than reality; in real life, Jews of different countries do not feel themselves a single united body though they do interact. Compare them with Catholics: these have the Pope and a single hierarchy, and still they are united in prayer only. Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united.
DARKMOON: Jews less united than the goyim? Wow! I never thought any group could be less united than the goyim, or more united than the Jews in knowing "what is good for the Jews". If you are trying to convince us that the Jews are DISUNITED just because no two Jews think alike, some preferring Buddhism to Judaism and others preferring kippas to hats, then you are on very shaky ground indeed! We are well aware that no two individuals, whether Jewish or non-Jewish, think alike; just as we are aware that no two individuals have identical fingerprints. It doesn't follow from this, however, that people with different opinions are going to be disunited, any more than it follows that people with different fingerprints are going to be disunited.
To say that Jews lack unity is almost like saying America lacks military power. Or the Queen of England is short of cash. The Jews have far more unity, I put it to you, than any other other ethnic group in the world. This fundamental cohesion of the Jews is something I have pointed out in my recent essay America Vanquished:
"The extraordinary success of the Jews, who make up only 2.5 percent of America's population, can be attributed to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly threaten them as a group." (See here)
Despite the superficial differences between various types of Jews, the Jews are surely a paradigm of unity and cohesion compared to other ethnic groups.
You yourself, Mr Shamir, have written: "Palestine is not the Ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is." Consider that statement. Can you seriously tell me that the Jews are likely to achieve this grandiose goal of world domination by being disunited and disorganized? by lacking coordination? No, of course not!
One could supply countless arguments to demonstrate the remarkable unity of the Jews in achieving "what is good for the Jews". Pray tell: how did the Jews manage to take over the mass media, Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, the executive branches of government, Wall Street, the world's banking system, the lavishly funded Think Tanks, even the porn industry, if they were disorganized and disunited?
The major Jewish organizations that crisscross America like a spider's web—AIPAC being only one of them—can hardly be accused of ineffective disunity.
You've heard of mesira, the code of honor among Jews that make them stick together through thick and thin, never betraying an organ-stealing rabbi or even a serial killer to the goy authorities. Isn't sticking together the ultimate form of unity?
You've heard of the Sayanim, Mossad's one million worldwide helpers. How these faceless individuals, all Jews living in lands outside Israel, work away for Israel in providing "safe houses", transportation, access to communications networks and other facilities for Mossad spies. Full details of the existence of the Mossad Sayanim network were given in the 1994 book The Other Side of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, himself a renegade Mossad agent.
The Jewish Sayanim remind me of bees, all buzzing away for the common good, all united by a common purpose: to cram the hive full of honey.
One final point, Mr Shamir, which I know will make you graciously concede victory to me on this vitally important issue: in saying that "the Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united" than the goyim, you are guilty of a glaring contradiction. Wasn't it only a few years ago that you argued the very opposite? Far from implying that the Jews were a disunited group, you stated that they possessed an almost supernatural unity, comparing them to locusts that moved in ordered formation to achieve their common goal.
"It is hard to swallow that the Jews have a strategy," you said, "but no strategist. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme strategist." And then, to drive home the point, you added the famous quotation from the Bible: 'The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation' and devastate whole countries as if by plan." (Cabbala of Power, p.13)
That last phrase—"and devastate whole countries as if by plan"—is your own. You are daringly comparing the Jews to locusts who have an uncanny and almost supernatural ability to act in unison.
CAN JEWS BE COMPARED TO LOCUSTS, ACTING IN COORDINATION? "The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation" (Proverbs 30:27) and devastate whole countries as if by plan.
SHAMIR: Israel is a very important element of Jewish life, Lasha, but this does not mean an Israeli Prime Minister can order Jews around.
Granted, politically active Americans think that one can't succeed without Jewish support. This much we can learn from the incredible reception of Netanyahu in the Capitol and from Obama's capitulation. And US politicians think that the US Jews love Israel; that is why they express their love of Israel. However, the American Jews' feelings towards Israel are not that straightforward. Remember a prominent American Jewish politician Henry Kissinger? He facilitated the greatest Arab attack on Israel in 1973 in order to take Israel down a notch.
So, US Jews are certainly an important part of the US elites. Consequently they influence world politics, while the Israeli Jews are just family and friends of these powerful American Jews. This is the secret of Israeli influence: without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.
"Without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size." — Israel Shamir
The US Jews' position in the US is so strong because US society has been formed and influenced by the Jewish spirit of predatory capitalism, as expounded by such diverse thinkers as Karl Marx, Werner Sombart and Milton Friedman. Defeat of financial predatory capitalism could undo the Jewish hold. It would de-Jewify the Jews and society in general.
And here we come to your second claim, Lasha: namely, that Russia and Germany are colonised by Jews. Even granting your poetic licence, this is far from the truth. Germany is not colonised by Jews; it is still occupied by the US troops.
DARKMOON: I'm not disagreeing with you, Mr Shamir, about Germany being under US occupation. In fact, I quote Eustace Mullins in Part 1 of my essay saying exactly the same thing. But I certainly never said that Germany had been "colonized by Jews". Where did I say that? I would never have made such a ridiculous statement. I said that about America, but not about Germany.
SHAMIR: Jews play a negligible part in modern German life, Lasha. Even after the the defeat of the Third Reich, there was no resurgence of the Jewish spirit. Germany has a strong social security structure. Predatory financial capitalism has made few inroads. Germany is not a neoliberal state. The Germans pay tribute to Israel, that's true; but this is only a result of American occupation. The West Germans are indeed indoctrinated in guilt feelings towards Jews, but East Germans have no guilt feelings whatsoever, and they influence the totality of German feelings. If and when US troops leave Germany, Germany will reassert itself.
Again, Russia is not colonized by Jews. Some Jewish oligarchs were expelled, and others were imprisoned by Putin. Russia usually votes against Israel in the UN and supplied enemies of Israel with its advanced weaponry. Russia now has fewer Jews than Scotland: about two hundred thousand altogether by official census, and twice that much by overblown Jewish organisations' estimate. Granted, Russia has no anti-Semitism, and it has some influential Jews, but the important decisions are not made by them.
Was Russia "colonized by Jews" after the October 1917 revolution? This is the weakest part of your essay, Lasha. I'm afraid you know little about this subject and just repeat the silly claims of others.
DARKMOON: Again, Mr Shamir, I must point out with all due respect that at no time did I ever claim that Russia was "colonized by Jews", nor did I even imply it. The same with Germany. However, if that is the impression I gave you, then I must apologize for not making my meaning clearer.
SHAMIR: You tell us that important Bolsheviks used pseudonyms; true, but this is not always connected with their Jewishness. Lenin's real name was Ulyanov, but this is not a Jewish name. The early Bolsheviks were guerrilla fighters, and they used all sorts of names to evade surveillance. This is also a part of underground ethos.
DARKMOON: Again, I am in full agreement with you, Mr Shamir. So there's no point ticking me off for disagreeing with you!
What I said in my article was that almost every single revolutionary Jew in Bolshevik Russia hid behind a non-Jewish name. This was either because they were engaged in subversive activities or because they were anxious to avoid being the victims of the virulent anti-semitism of those times.
Pseudonyms were adopted by non-Jews just as frequently if they were involved in seditious activities. Stalin, whose real name was Joseph Djugashvili, had at least 40 pseudonyms. See Simon Sebag Montefiore's Young Stalin, p.395, for a list of his false names. Lenin, who was half Jewish, not only had over a hundred bogus names, but also went in for glued-on wigs and giant spectacles!
SHAMIR: Abu Jihad, Abu Ammar and Abu Mazen are nicknames, but surely they are not Jews. You and your readers, Lasha, should read Lindemann's book Esau's Tears. This deals extensively with the question of the Bolshevik leaders Jewishness.
These crazy numbers you quote— "66 million Russian Christians killed by Jews"— "out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real Russians"—were invented by anticommunists.
DARKMOON: Good point, Mr Shamir. I concede that the 66 million figure is probably a gross exaggeration, just as the SIX MILLION FIGURE is often alleged to be. (Note, I myself make no comment on this figure, since mathematics is not my forte.) However, both figures have been advanced by their respective propagandists. I decided to quote the 66 million figure for two reasons: (a) because I believe it was mentioned by the great Solzhenitsyn who was not given to lying; and (b) because the 66 million figure is actually mentioned in the title of Eustace Mullins' classic essay, "The Secret Holocaust", which I quoted extensively in my article. (See here). Since I was quoting from Mullins, I decided to quote his figures also, giving my readers his viewpoint.
The most conservative figure for the Russian Holocaust, now agreed upon by specialist historians and even cited in the Times newspaper (UK) is 50 million dead Russians. This figure was achieved within a 36-year period of mass murder (1917-1953), initiated by Lenin the half-Jew and continued by Stalin, a Georgian non-Jew, who surrounded himself on all sides by Jewish commissars and sexy young Jewesses he liked to bed.
If you think fifty million deaths is an inflated figure, I assure you it is not.
One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty million. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and proclaimed, "Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her skirts!"
Apart from Kaganovich, there were other Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn't they? — given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his basement — probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519 ).
At no other time in the history of the world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.
America now faces a similar saturation problem. There have been no Soviet-style massacres in America — not yet, thank God. But who knows what grisly surprises history has up its sleeve?
If the Jews can kill 50 million people in Russia and get away with it, they can kill 50 million people in America too, but maybe they won't get away with it so easily next time. If they can do it once, they can do it twice — unless the leopard changes its spots.
SHAMIR: We know that imperialist propaganda is able to utilize anti-Jewish prejudice in its own interests: thus, when the Empire bombed Libya, its propagandists improbably claimed that Qaddafi is a Jew and a sympathiser of Israel. When the Empire hunted Julian Assange, its fifth column claimed that he is a Mossad agent. For this reason one should be cautious at accepting such claims: they can be done by enemies with subversive purpose.
Jews played an important part in Soviet Russia's life, and they paid for that by their obedience and strict observance of Russia's interests. If they strayed, they were severely punished by Stalin; if they played ball, they were allowed to stay in positions of power.
The lesson of Soviet Russia and Jews was directly opposite to that read by Lasha: even if Jews play an important role in the country, a determined ruler can correct and limit their influence.
This can be done by undoing financial capitalism. Not in vain, some Jewish pundits describe Occupy Wall Street as an "anti-Semitic movement". Though the participants surely harbor no evil thoughts about the Jews, their goal of destroying the neoliberal model is at variance with Jewish power structures. Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over.
THE ROTHSCHILDS AT PRAYER: "Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over." — Israel Shamir
"More than one family friend has mentioned that, for every meal, the Rothschild family sets a place at the table for Lucifer."
— Fritz Springermeier, quote and picture found here.
DARKMOON: (summing up): I am not really in disagreement with you on most important points. Even though I have accused you of being guilty of a "glaring contradiction" — your apparent U-turn on the unity of the Jews, once united like a swarm of locusts flying in ordered ranks, now disunited and split into several conflicting groups — this need not in fact be a contradiction at all. It could be a development or new nuance to your views, an added complexity; indeed, a kind of paradox in which the Jews are united and disunited at the same time, just as the universe is filled with light and darkness at the same time, and just as good and evil exist simultaneously in the same heart.
On one point, however, I am forced to take issue with you: I never said that Germany and Russia were "Jewish colonies".
America, yes; but not Germany and Russia. And America only in a metaphorical sense. To all intents and purposes, America has become a Jewish colony.
Jews did not emigrate to Germany and Russia en masse as they emigrated to the United States. They were already well entrenched in Germany and Russia, part of the unassimilated population of those two nations for several centuries. They sprung to prominence in Germany, reaching their maximum degree of influence in the time of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), just before the ascent of Hitler to power.
In Russia, the Jews sprung to similar prominence at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, led on by the Jew Lenin and his Shabbat goy henchman, Stalin, who was later to become the world's greatest mass murderer—aided and abetted by his closely knit contingent of court Jews.
Never before have I read a biography with so many Jews in the forefront, all seething like maggots in the rich soil of Mother Russia, all thirsting like vampires for the blood of their Christian victims.
Full marks to Simon Sebag Montefiore, himself a Jew, for having the courage to draw our attention to these frightening freaks of nature.
They belong in the seventh circle of Dante's hell.
"ANOTHER PEOPLE WILL POSSESS YOUR LAND…" — Lasha Darkmoon, 'The Coming Doom'.
Life is too short and precious to waste it on "anti-Semitism". One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.